Thanks for your feedback.
It can do program calls and use files etc, so it is not that limited.
The primary reason I am looking at it, is because jt400.jar is designed very
robustly (all classes, no interfaces) making it a very interesting exercise
to do integration tests (etc) without having an actual - and properly
configured - AS/400 system to talk to. I think I've found an angle but a
simpler solution would be preferred and jtopenlite might be it.
/Thorbjørn
-----Original Message-----
From: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Pete Helgren
Sent: 13. maj 2013 20:37
To: java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Anyone tried jtopenlite yet?
I took a quick look but frankly, writing native Android apps just hasn't had
a high enough ROI for me to invest much time in it, so I haven't spent any
time with the "lite" version of JTOpen. It is SO much simpler to write a
REST app (or a servlet on the i ) that returns JSON directly from the i
rather than write an Android app that used JDBC to communicate with a remote
i that I haven't found a compelling reason to go there (yet).
There might be a use case for using it in a Raspberry Pi installation where
overall storage is limited but in the mobile world I haven't found a use for
it.
Pete Helgren
www.petesworkshop.com
GIAC Secure Software Programmer-Java
On 5/13/2013 6:10 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Hi
I was just wondering if anyone has tried out the new (since jtopen
7.7.1) jtopenlite alternative to jt400.jar yet, and had experiences to
share?
Thanks
/Thorbjørn
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing
list To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
midrange.com
