Re: RUNJVA in CCSID 5026 results in JVA0122 rc 1? -- JAVA400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: RUNJVA in CCSID 5026 results in JVA0122 rc 1?
From: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:10:03 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Den 16/07/10 22.33, David Gibbs skrev:

Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:

If it is a problem with the classic JVM, would the J9 JVM be an option?

I can't make assumptions about what JVM a customer has installed.

Our minimum OS level is V5R3 ... and the 32bit JVM was first offered in V5R4.

david

I know, but I belive that if a given scenario is "you are running CCSID 5026, and the Classic JVM has a show stopper bug acknowledged by IBM which is fixed in the J9 one" that might a good reason for the customer to consider installing an extra JRE.

Question is, what code do you have that essentially locks you with the Classic JVM?

Follow-Ups:

Re: RUNJVA in CCSID 5026 results in JVA0122 rc 1? , David Gibbs

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.