Thanks to all for responding. My Cobol colleagues did not understand the
PROCEDURE DIVISION USING xxx statement you mentioned, and after evaluating
the options in light of a tight deadline, we - for now - went for the small
Java parser.

Perhaps you would make a tiny example with the steps needed to get the PCML
file?

Thanks :)

/Thorbjørn

-----Original Message-----
From: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jon Paris
Sent: 9. juli 2010 16:50
To: java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: JAVA400-L Digest, Vol 8, Issue 95

Thorbj?rn - I'm fascinated as to why you think this is simpler? You
have a lot of work to do to generate a structure that the compiler via
PCML can do for you.

All you have to do is to specify PROCEDURE DIVISION USING xxx in a
program where xxx is the name of the 01 structure you want to map and
the compiler does the work for you generating a PCML that if needed
can go though a xslt transform into most anything you want..

I guess I must be missing something.


Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



On Jul 9, 2010, at 8:47 AM, java400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I've started with having a look on the OPTION(*MAP) as it seems to
be the
simplest to get started with from where we are now.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.