|
Hi Ashish:and
We deal with this problem on websphere 6.1. At the administrative
console of websphere server, go to Resources, JDBC, Data Sources, then
select your datasource name.
Next, select Personalized Properties, and insert value "iso"
dateFormat property.
I hope this could help you
Regards
Gladys Méndez
Caja Bancaria
Montevideo, Uruguay
-----Mensaje original-----
message: 4
date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:38:53 -0400
from: Ashish Kulkarni <ashish.kulkarni13@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Handling Dates in websphere before 1940 causing issue
Hi
Has anyone seen issue with dates if the date is before 1940? We have
this jsf application where we map date from screen to backingbean, If
i enter 09/03/1939, my backing bean gets date 09/02/1939.
Has anyone seen this issue, we are on websphere 6.1 on AS400 V6R1
--
Ashish
www.ayurwellness.com
www.mysoftwareneeds.com
------------------------------
message: 5
date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:44:48 -0500
from: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Optimize java to run on AS400
Ashish Kulkarni wrote:
We are on V6R1 and just turned on 64 bit on AS400
If you're using the 64bit JVM, then you're using the PASE based JVM ...
I don't think you need to do anything to optimize the bytecode.think
At one time, with the classic JVM, you could run the CRTJVAPGM command
to pre-create the native code that was attached to the byte code. But
I
the need for that mostly went away in later releases.to
david
--
IBM i on Power Systems - For when you can't afford to be out of
business
------------------------------
message: 6
date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:18:42 -0600
from: Pete Helgren <Pete@xxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Optimize java to run on AS400
Ashish,
David went where I was going to go. If you are on the more recent
versions of the OS, you shouldn't have to optimize. Also, as I
understand it, the 64bit "classic" version is going away in IBM i 7.1.
The 32bit JVM has performed very well in my Tomcat and JRuby
applications (Glassfish) on i. Not sure what WAS is best optimized for.
Pete
On 7/6/2010 7:44 AM, David Gibbs wrote:
Ashish Kulkarni wrote:and I don't think you need to do anything to optimize the bytecode.
We are on V6R1 and just turned on 64 bit on AS400If you're using the 64bit JVM, then you're using the PASE based JVM ...
At one time, with the classic JVM, you could run the CRTJVAPGM
command
pre-create the native code that was attached to the byte code. But Ithink
the need for that mostly went away in later releases.
david
------------------------------
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400
(JAVA400-L) digest list To post a message email:
JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
End of JAVA400-L Digest, Vol 8, Issue 92
****************************************
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400
(JAVA400-L) mailing list To post a message email:
JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
