×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I've been using ProgramCall successfully for years. You have to get the
datatypes right and do the conversions, but once you've got one, all the
rest come pretty easily. And I have some with lots and lots of
parameters going both directions with lots of data types. What do think
is the advantage of PCML? Don't you have to do basically the same thing
in a different format?
-----Original Message-----
From: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Gibbs
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:06 AM
To: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400
Subject: Re: Retrieving integer parameter after JT400 ProgramCall?
James Perkins wrote:
You might want to take a look at PCML and using the
com.ibm.as400.data.ProgramCallDocument. It's MUCH better to deal with.
I second this suggestion ... PCML is much easier to deal with than
coding the parameters manually.
david
--
IBM i on Power Systems - For when you can't afford to be out of business
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400
(JAVA400-L) mailing list To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
midrange.com
