Re: How to resolve a problem that has to do with different functionstrying to setup a different Java Virtual Machine? -- JAVA400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: How to resolve a problem that has to do with different functionstrying to setup a different Java Virtual Machine?
From: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:26:35 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Joe Sam Shirah skrev:

Second, I hate to sound like a broken record, but developers can avoid so many of these kinds of problems by using messaging ( I include dataqueues in the generic term "messaging". ) against Java handlers. That's even true in Java to Java contexts when different applications must communicate.

Just for the record - how do you enforce access control on dataqueue messaging? Preferrably so only "blessed" programs can access the dataqueues?

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.