Re: Java and V6R1 Odd Problem?

You, I actually did notice that. I think it was the TreeMap?

Actually, that was a GREAT question. It's something I notice, but didn't
think about until you asked. Made me really look at the code one more time a
pay a little more attention. Thanks!

James R. Perkins


On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

James Perkins skrev:

Thorbjørn,
Thanks! Sure enough when I run your code without the -D argument, I get "
java.vm.name=IBM J9 VM". When running with an override to the version I

get

"java.vm.name = Classic VM". I must have missed that somewhere in the
documentation.

I really like the way that IBM has implemented Java on the i with a
single command, which invokes the appropriate binary. As opposed to the
Sun way of a zillion versions all of which get installed somewhere
differently and with no shortcuts what so ever (so your JAVA_HOME
environment variable break from time to time).

Then again I like the way that WSDCi can use its own _certified_ JVM
without subtly breaking when you update.

Can't have it all :)

Looks like it's time to go back and do some more reading ;-)

Nah. Code should be selfexplanatory :)

Did you note that PropDump listed the properties alphabetically? Can
you see how? ;-)
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.