Re: WDSC changing to RDi -- JAVA400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: WDSC changing to RDi
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:38:28 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Kelly Cookson wrote:

I just read your article, Joe. IBM has basically just pushed me back
down to ADTS/OPM. I just don't see how my shop will be able to justify
the added costs of RDi.
Thanks for the article, though. Very helpful.

Well, RDi is meant to replace ADTS. Yuo are supposed to move from ADTS to RDi; they cost the same. And David wants this to move to WDSC, so I am getting out of the thread.

Joe

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.