Re: Java Stored Procedures

[Bruce Jin <brucej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Can you call IBM or post question on their AS400 news group 
(ibm.software.db2.os400)?


Scott Jordan wrote:
> Only when it is called from JDBC do we get 1.2 when we call it 
> interactively it obeys the system-level SystemDefault.properties, or the 
> user-level SystemDefault.properties (if available).
>
> Tried dropping & recreating the procedure many....many...times.  :)
>
> Unfortuntely, it has moved past interesting from our perspective! :)  We 
> are closer to annoying!  :)
>
>
>
> Bruce Jin <brucej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> Sent by: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 08/03/2006 04:17 PM
> Please respond to
> Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 
> <java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> To
> Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 
> <java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Java Stored Procedures
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Very interesting!
>
> This means the code is running in a pre 1.4 JVM. But you said you did 
> not have jdk 1.2 on the system. Do you have jdk 1.3? When you run Test 
> locally on AS400 (which calls SSIAPI) , the statement 
> System.getProperty("java.version") produces a “1.4” while the same 
> statement in SSIAPI produces a “1.2”?
>
> Maybe try to drop the procedure and recreate it.
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
> Scott Jordan wrote:
>   
> > Hey Bruce!
> >
> > It blew up when I tried 1.4 code.  :(
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> >
> > Bruce Jin <brucej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> > Sent by: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 08/02/2006 09:50 AM
> > Please respond to
> > Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 
> > <java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > To
> > Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 
> > <java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: Java Stored Procedures
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > How do you know you are getting JDK 1.2 from a remotely called stored 
> > Procedure?
> >
> >
> > Scott Jordan wrote:
> >
> >     
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > We are writing Java Stored Procedures on V5R1.  Our Java.Version always 
> > >       
>
>   
> > > returns 1.2.  However, when we run the same procedure interactively, we 
> > >       
>
>   
> > > get JDK 1.4.  We've tried messing with the SystemDefault.properties 
> > >       
> both 
>   
> >     
> > > for the system and in the user's directory, as well as QUSER, and even 
> > > QSYS!
> > >
> > > We removed JDK 1.2.  We still get JDK 1.2 from a remotely called stored 
> > >       
>
>   
> > > procedure.
> > >
> > > Has anyone else experienced this?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > >
> > >       
> >     
>
>