|
Larry Loen wrote: > I'm a bit at a loss. Is the issue with the _contents_ of the field or the > column name itself? It was the column name itself. > If it's the column name itself, why not just retreive it by number as per > the JDBC interfaces? That's not the way the program was coded. *PERSONALLY*, I prefer to retrieve columns by name, so my code is relatively self documenting. david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.