Larry Loen wrote:
> I'm a bit at a loss.  Is the issue with the _contents_ of the field or the 
> column name itself?

It was the column name itself.

> If it's the column name itself, why not just retreive it by number as per 
> the JDBC interfaces?

That's not the way the program was coded.  *PERSONALLY*, I prefer to
retrieve columns by name, so my code is relatively self documenting.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.