Larry Loen wrote: > I'm a bit at a loss. Is the issue with the _contents_ of the field or the > column name itself? It was the column name itself. > If it's the column name itself, why not just retreive it by number as per > the JDBC interfaces? That's not the way the program was coded. *PERSONALLY*, I prefer to retrieve columns by name, so my code is relatively self documenting. david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.