RE: trigger or listener?

> Does OS400 start up a separate JVM instance for
> each trigger call. 

I don't believe it would be one for each call, but I think there will be
one for each job. And that could be expensive in itself. I think the
DataQ approach is the best idea, unless you need it done synchronously,
then you need the java call or web service call directly in the trigger.


-Walden


------------
Walden H Leverich III
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)


-----Original Message-----
From: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Holm
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 9:29 PM
To: java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: trigger or listener?

I think a key question is:  Does OS400 start up a separate JVM instance
for
each trigger call.  I'm not sure but I think it might.  I *think I
remember
that for Java sql functions it did and resulted in unacceptable
performance
in that situation. 

 

Paul Holm
Senior Web Architect
PlanetJ Corp. 
WOW, Web Applications In Under 5 Minutes
HYPERLINK "http://www.gotWebData.net"; \nhttp://www.gotWebData.net