Re: trigger or listener? -- JAVA400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: trigger or listener?
From: Glenn Holmer <gholmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 17:02:31 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wednesday 05 October 2005 11:50, Jose Luis Calvo wrote:
> One way to do that is using the best of the two alternatives, the
> trigger (may be in RPG) put an entry in a DTAQ, an have a Java
> program waiting in that DTAQ.

Thanks for the replies; we're going to set up a trigger against the 
database on the '400 that writes the record into a data queue.  A 
program on the Linux server will read from that queue and write the 
record into his (Postgres) database.  I'll let you know how it turns 
out...

Follow-Ups:

Re: trigger or listener? , Glenn Holmer
Re: trigger or listener? , Rich Duzenbury

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.