RE: iSeries JVM version -- JAVA400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: iSeries JVM version
From: "Hall, Philip C." <phall@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:33:17 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:java400-l-
> Subject: Re: iSeries JVM version
> 
> For info,
> the -server JVM, in a pure EJB environment, take approx. 30% longer than
> the client VM,
> tested with sun JVM under Win32 and Linux.

Start up time or runtime?

--phil

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: iSeries JVM version , Franco Biaggi

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.