|
> From: David Morris > > Joe, > > I don't think it is all the JVM, the difference is in the operating > system. The CPU speed and cache, disk cache, and memory affinity tuning > of a single workload are probably the biggest part of the improvement. > This isn't such a big deal with real-life mixed workloads. Here is a > link for you to look at: > http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/perfmgmt/pdf/memaffin.pdf I'm with you, David, it might be a multitude of factors. In my article for next Monday, I point out that we're talking about a 2004 i5 595 and a 2000 model 840, so the differences can be far more than just the JVM. At the same time, I guess my point is that, no matter the reason, if the numbers have jumped that high then there's a good chance that my WebSphere applications will run a LOT better on the i5 boxes. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.