|
> From: Nathan Andelin > > > One technique I use is a servlet proxy that is not > > multithreaded that established a connection with a > > batch job. > > That's better. The Servlet presumably hands off significant processing to > a > separate job, freeing up the container to dispatch similar work to the > same > proxy in a separate thread. Are you careful not to perform significant > workloads in your proxy? <grin> You know me better than that, Nathan! The workloads are done by an RPG back end, of course. Depending on the model (client/server vs. server/client) the RPG may also be doing the application control (that is, determining which panel to display next). Either way, the servlet proxy usually does little more than convert EBCDIC messages to beans and hand off control to a JSP. This is the sort of thing I really want to get into at the application web site. Seriously, the choice of architecture is going to be crucial as to the choice of technology components (and vice versa). I think we're going to find that there are multiple routes to the same goal that will use slightly different techniques, but still meet the business requirements of a given case. I have to believe that a properly designed JSP/servlet solution has many of the same characteristics as a properly designed CGI solution, and that the choice between them will be a bit more subtle than simply "Java vs. RPG". Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.