|
Joe, I Love these arguments, I will use it in my further presentations and articles, might I name the originating author? > Let's be clear: PROGRAMMER ERROR IS NOT A VALID REASON FOR COMMITMENT > CONTROL. If anything, it becomes a crutch that lazy programmers rely on > as opposed to actually testing their code. and I will go on: lazy programmers of the world, use commitment control, these arguments are the best of all, most programmers are lazy programmers and BTW lazy programmers are good programmers, they save money of their customers. Dieter
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.