Re: Tomcat VS New WAS-Express -- JAVA400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Tomcat VS New WAS-Express
From: "David Gibbs" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:27:36 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400<java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

"Larry" <larryhytail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:20030318200640.8432039F6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Now I see that I can trade in my WAS licenses for WAS-Express licenses.
The
> added benefit I see with WAS Express over Tomcat is that IBM will actually
> acknowledge its existance and provide support.

Didn't they acknowledge & support Tomcat at one point too?

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.