|
If you guys have the funds, I'd invest in a DSD and move the Domino servers off to that. Especially if you're going to run the Domino HTTP stack. We have one Domino HTTP server running on an 8-way 830, and it can spike up 15% of the CPU time when it gets busy. I can only imagine the hit of running 6 of them on a 720. Mike E. P.Goovaerts@Clippe r.Be To: web400@midrange.com Sent by: cc: java400-l@midrange.com java400-l-admin@mi Subject: WebSphere on NT vs. AS/400 drange.com 05/15/2002 11:23 AM Please respond to java400-l This is a multipart message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Sorry lads! Intention is to load WebSphere on a Win2000 machine TEMPORARY. This allows us to completely remove and reinstall WAS355SE on our 720. We would do this to be sure we have a clean, nice, good functioning WAS... Before doing this, I wanted some opinions about this because I still have some reservations about the workload on the system: IBM HTTP server WAS355SE DOMINO 5.09 with 6 servers installed in separate pools with 6 http server-, 6 admins-, 6 pop3-, 6 smtp-, 6 qnninsts-, 6 routers-, 6 replica- and amgr-jobs active Native Apps Around 3000 jobs active Taking off Domino now is not an option. We ported it from NTserver to AS400 because of too much problems and NOT reliable! On the AS400 we also had the possibility to split the Domino envy to 6 servers. In case of problems we don't have to shut down the complete Domino envy anymore. Patrick
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.