|
My AS/400 administrator informed me that we are current on PTFs. Product ID/PTF ID . . . . . . . . . . : 5769999 TL00147 Are there any particular PTFs that I should ensure have been applied? Thanks, Al Heitkamp H.B. Fuller Company Arden Hills, MN >>> <cujo@us.ibm.com> 07/14 11:01 AM >>> Hmm... I think that should all work, but we have run into a couple issues recently with our parameter support. Please ensure that you are pretty up to date on your v4r4 PTFs, and try again after getting the latest if you are not. If the problem persists, please try to find the simplest example that you can recreate the problem in and e-mail it to me directly. I will figure out what is going on and get back to you and/or the group as appropriate. Thanks. Regards, Richard D. Dettinger AS/400 Java Data Access Team "TRUE! nervous, very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why WILL you say that I am mad? The disease had sharpened my senses, not destroyed, not dulled them. " - Edgar Allan Poe "The Tell-Tale Heart" "Al Heitkamp" <Al.Heitkamp@hbfuller.com> on 07/14/2000 09:40:48 AM Please respond to JAVA400-L@midrange.com To: JAVA400-L@midrange.com cc: Subject: Problems Caching and reusing JDBC CallableStatement objects I have written an application that runs on the AS/400 and calls stored procedures using JDBC driver com.ibm.db2.jdbc.app.DB2Driver. My first release of the application created a new CallableStatement object each time I called a stored procedure. This has been working fine for some time now. In an attempt to improve performance, I modified the application to cache the CallableStatement objects for each different stored procedure call, then reusing the CallableStatement object for subsequent stored procedure calls. I am now getting the error *Conversion error on input host variable or parameter *N.* I returned to creating the new CallableStatement for every stored procedure call and the application works fine again. Caching the CallableStatements works fine against an Oracle database and improved performance by almost 10 percent. Has anyone seen this problem before? We are running V4R4 and JDK 1.1.7. Thanks, Al Heitkamp H.B. Fuller Company Arden Hills, MN +--- | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net +--- +--- | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net +--- +--- | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.