|
Joe -- You've done a terrific job and a lot of work! Was this all with bytecode? Was JIT enabled or disabled? Was there any compiled Java involved? It certainly is disappointing that the 400 runs so much slower than the client, which I assume was some flavor of Windows. Given IBM's betting the farm on Java, I think they'd better start milking the cows faster if they want to save the farm. -- Gary L Peskin The Firstech Corporation +1.323.658.1146 http://www.simdate.com pluta@nexgensoftware.com wrote: > > Recently in the News/400 forum, a couple of readers and I have begun a thread >on > testing Java/400 performance. (The URL is > http://www.news400.com/Forums/Thread.cfm?CFApp=36&Thread_ID=9888&mc=13 if >you're > interested in following the thread.) I've spent quite a bit of time over the > last week putting together a test bed. Well, last night (this morning <sigh>) > ... +--- | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
