RE: Directions for Java/400

["Nelson, Jim (RCIS)" <Jim.Nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I've been hearing some of the same 'proprietary software' responses when
suggesting these tools.  And I guess it is a good point, since we have not
yet committed to the AS/400 as our server (my bias notwithstanding).

Joe, have you done any testing to see if your stuff is as fast, faster,
whatever, compared to SQL? 

Thanks, JN
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pluta@nexgensoftware.com [SMTP:pluta@nexgensoftware.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 11:29 AM
> To:   JAVA400-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: Directions for Java/400
> 
          
        2. In my opinion, however, we do need to build classes with
portability
        in mind which means less usage of the tool box since the tool box
        classes are as400 specific.

        Ah, now THIS is an area where I tend to disagree, and I'd love to
get some
        dialogue started (IS EVERYBODY LISTENING??).

        (etc...) 
+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---