• Subject: RE: Directions for Java/400
  • From: "Nelson, Jim (RCIS)" <Jim.Nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 13:22:04 -0500

I've been hearing some of the same 'proprietary software' responses when
suggesting these tools.  And I guess it is a good point, since we have not
yet committed to the AS/400 as our server (my bias notwithstanding).

Joe, have you done any testing to see if your stuff is as fast, faster,
whatever, compared to SQL? 

Thanks, JN

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pluta@nexgensoftware.com [SMTP:pluta@nexgensoftware.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 11:29 AM
> To:   JAVA400-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: Directions for Java/400
        2. In my opinion, however, we do need to build classes with
        in mind which means less usage of the tool box since the tool box
        classes are as400 specific.

        Ah, now THIS is an area where I tend to disagree, and I'd love to
get some
        dialogue started (IS EVERYBODY LISTENING??).

| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.