I've been hearing some of the same 'proprietary software' responses when suggesting these tools. And I guess it is a good point, since we have not yet committed to the AS/400 as our server (my bias notwithstanding). Joe, have you done any testing to see if your stuff is as fast, faster, whatever, compared to SQL? Thanks, JN > -----Original Message----- > From: firstname.lastname@example.org [SMTP:email@example.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 11:29 AM > To: JAVA400-L@midrange.com > Subject: Re: Directions for Java/400 > 2. In my opinion, however, we do need to build classes with portability in mind which means less usage of the tool box since the tool box classes are as400 specific. Ah, now THIS is an area where I tend to disagree, and I'd love to get some dialogue started (IS EVERYBODY LISTENING??). (etc...) +--- | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: firstname.lastname@example.org +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.