|
hmm... but the doc block needs to be a valid comment for rpg. i'll look at the code. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: iledocs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:iledocs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Holden Tommy Gesendet: Freitag, 25. August 2006 15:25 An: ILEDocs Betreff: Re: [IleDocs] docu block for subroutines The ileparser doesn't even look at the comment markers...just for the keywords, prefixes & suffixes...so it shouldn't matter how you set up your comments. Thanks, Tommy Holden -----Original Message----- From: iledocs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:iledocs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Knezevic, Mihael Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 6:48 AM To: ILEDocs Subject: [IleDocs] docu block for subroutines hi, i wanted to ask you about your ideas for a doc block for a subroutine. my default doc block /** and */ ain't working in free for a subroutine. the only valid doc block would be something which starts with // or am i wrong? something like the following: <code> /// // my doc stuff /// begsr MySr; ... endsr; </code> but i don't like to have 2 different doc block types in a program. what do you think about it? and has anybody implemented it allready? nice weekend. mihael
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.