ods 48 vs R6 clients -- DOMINO400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: ods 48 vs R6 clients
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:33:46 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/domino400>
List-help: <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Lotus Domino on the iSeries / AS400 <domino400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:domino400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400>, <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400>, <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I've noticed that I can compact my archives to ods 48 and my R6 clients
can access them just fine.

Since all servers run some version of 8 is there a drawback to compacting
the regular mail files to ods 48 (R8)? Will it cause any issues for the
R6 clients? We are NOT talking about replacing the template from R6 to R8
at this time.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: ods 48 vs R6 clients , Chris Whisonant

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.