|
There are times when LDAPDEBUG is needed. LDAPDEBUG output in the console log can both provide additional information on the LDAP operations, as shown below, and also information on other things happening on the server that could have an impact on the LDAP service (e.g., indexing, compacting). However, the LDAPDEBUG output describing a single operation is spread over many lines, often interleaved with similar output from other LDAP threads, making it hard to read. A big advantage of the LDAP activity log is that the information from each LDAP operation is collected in one record, and that these records can be easily searched, viewed, and accessed by programs using standard Notes features. Because LDAPDEBUG data often yields its secrets only after considerable analysis, it is often better to start with a lower level of logging. This is both less demanding on the system having the problem, in terms of performance and disk space, and less demanding on the analyst. Because LDAPDEBUG output is usually a jumble of messages from different threads, use debug_threadid. Except for simple cases, you will benefit from utilities that separate log data by thread for analysis, such as a powerful text editor, or LogThreadTail and LogThreadSplit. LDAPDEBUG=1 (trace) provides roughly the same information found in the LDAP activity log. The activity log does a better job of correlating IP addresses with LDAP operations. The LDAPDEBUG=1 log shows which entries were returned, not just the count given in the activity log. LDAP> Found matching entry, Note ID: 5310 LDAP> SendSearchEntry, sending entry CN=Polar Bear,O=org3 LDAPDEBUG=1 also shows which address book views are being searched, and how, which can be helpful in understanding performance and configuration problems. LDAP> *** Searching in database C:\Lotus\Domino\Data\names.nsf ... LDAP> Type of search: View Search LDAP> ... Searching entries for a filter 'sn = bear' in ($LDAPS) LDAP> GetSearchEntry State The timestamps on these search messages can be used to identify performance issues such as non-optimal database searches. LDAPDEBUG=3 (trace + args) shows operation arguments, e.g., for the bind operation, but LDAPDEBUG=1 shows all the arguments for the search operation, which is usually the operation of interest. LDAPDEBUG=3 does not increase the size of the LDAPDEBUG very much. LDAPDEBUG=7 (trace + args + entry) shows the attributes values returned by the search, instead of just the name of the returned entry. This is especially valuable when the problem may involve the client not getting back what it expected. (Compare to LDAPDEBUG=1, above.) However, it can greatly increase the size of the LDAPDEBUG output. LDAP> Found matching entry, Note ID: 5310 LDAP> Entry: LDAP> dn: CN=Polar Bear,O=org3 LDAP> cn: Polar Bear LDAP> fullname: CN=Polar Bear,O=org3 LDAP> fullname: CN=Polar Bear LDAP> mail: PolarBear@xxxxxxxxx LDAP> SendSearchEntry, sending entry CN=Polar Bear,O=org3 Higher levels of LDAP debug are generally interesting only when debugging specific types of problems, such as access control problems (add 96 to the LDAPDEBUG number), or byte-level problems with returned data (add 16 to the LDAPDEBUG number). Walter Scanlan Senior Software Engineer Domino & Workplace for iSeries 507-286-6088 wscanlan@xxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.