RE: 170's performance after V5R1 - IPL fixes

["Mark Villa" <markvilla@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks to everyone,

(Andy wrote)
~~~Because this is a DSD box, it is entirely possible that
~~~CFINT could kick
~~~in with little or no interactive load.  There are going to be three
~~~performance tiers:  Domino workloads get the full processor,
~~~everything
~~~else gets a small percentage, and interactive gets even less.
~~~
~~~What is your processor feature code Mark?

Andy, it is the bottom rung, 2407

~~~You said that your were
~~~running a light HTTP workload, anything else?
Not really, it is a test box. At 4.5 we could hammer it with interactive
queries and it would not give up, it outperformed a Model 600 hands down.
This system is just behaving weird with V5R1
Sometimes paging is instantaneous, sometimes doing a WRKACTJOB takes 3-4
minutes with 0 load.
It points to a networking issue (nothing has changed).
We recreated the line description today at 10M instead of AUTO. I saw an
APAR on the migration of the older lines.
I have also seen messages in the archives about Line's causing performance
problems after going to V5R1.
I hope this is what causes it.
I just read through the performance guide changes for DSD on V5R1.
Basically, if it is a better domino with this version it also means
developer loads get even less attention.


Thanks,
Mark in Charleston SC