|
The errors generated in CODE with SQLRPGLE source members will supposedly be fixed in the next release of WDSC after 5.1.2. This is where you edit any line of an SQLRPGLE member and errors are automatically displayed for embedded SQL lines. >From IBM: "The problem CODE Editor and SQLRPGLE source was reported to the developer. He requested an APAR to track the problem. APAR SE16960 was created as a result. The developer proposes to fix the problem in the next release of WDSC because the LPEX editor can be used instead. Please let me know if this is acceptable." I said this was acceptable. Craig Strong ** Craig wrote: To clarify naming: >> What is the source type on your source member? Source type is SQLRPGLE. That is what I meant when I said RPGLE SQL (just to distinguish from COBOL, etc). >> When you say LPEX Editor, do you mean RSE? Yes. I maybe should have said Remote Systems LPEX editor. >> This name game is really stupid, eh? I don't think so. I think Remote Systems LPEX Editor describes itself well apart from CODE. I think the idea is that LPEX editor will replace CODE. I have heard the term jLPEX editor to identify it as Java. That term may be dead now but I don't know. I do wish we would always have 1 agreed on name for it though. I'm sure IBM has their reasons for their naming. I've gotten used to when companies merge and change their names. We just have to live with what they call themselves at that moment. ** Vern wrote: Craig What is the source type on your source member? LPEX stands for something like Live Parsing Editor and has been a part of CODE from its start on OS/2. So the name game is confusing. When you say LPEX Editor, do you mean RSE? CODE is LPEX Editor. The editor in RSE is written in Java and is also called LPEX Editor, but it only looks like the editor in CODE. This name game is really stupid, eh? Vern At 01:07 PM 7/30/2004, you wrote: It appears that CODE in WDSC 5.1.2 cannot recognize embedded RPGLE SQL as valid statements. Whenever changing any source line with embedded SQL, we get the following: RNF5001E Control-Level entry is not valid; defaults to previous control level. RNF5006E Not entry is neither N nor blank; defaults to blank. RNF5007E Conditioning-Indicator entry is not valid; defaults to blanks. RNF0289E Entry contains data that is not valid; only valid data is used. RNF5010E Factor 1 entry is not blank for the specified operation; defaults to blanks. Fortunately, it compiles fine and the LPEX editor is okay. I thought I would run it by this list before submitting this to IBM. Anyone having this problem or heard of this? Does anyone use CODE and embedded RPGLE SQL? If so, and you are not on WDSC 5.1.2 yet, you may want to watch this thread.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.