|
Vern, It'd seem that 550 records are not the problem as one group has little trouble. Paging in VARPG is a pain in the butt for the user, just as it would be in Outlook or Excel. Using basic diagnostic rules, if one group is ok and one group is slow, I'd begin looking for differences in the way the two groups connect to the internet, or how the two offices are set up.. It'd seem the application itself can't really be the issue. The means of access with VARPG is DDM. --------------------------------------------------------- Booth Martin http://www.MartinVT.com Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------- -------Original Message------- From: CODE/400 Discussion & Support Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 7:37:32 AM To: CODE/400 Discussion & Support Subject: Re: performance issue.. Mahesh A couple things- 1. Although 550 is not a lot of records, IMO, you're better off loading a page at a time with SFLSIZ = SFLPAG + 1. Look at the Application Display Programming manual for everything you need to learn about this technique, called something like subfile size greater than subfile page. In this technique, fewer records are downloaded, therefore it'll take less time to see the app the first time. Each page down will take a little longer, but that's probably better than what you have now. 2. I suspect the network connection, although 15 minutes seems inordinate. What is the Internet connection - modem? Then it'll be pretty bad. I suspect you don't have cable or DSL connections in India, do you? I'm ignorant here. Or are they on high-speed T1 or better connections? What is the US connection? In other words, what is different? What are the Ethernet speeds at the various sites? 10, 100, 1000? What about computer speeds - memory & CPU? 3. What is the access means to the data? ODBC? Then you have a number of optimization possibilities. If JDBC, that often is based on ODBC, so the same thing there. The latest version of the driver has more things you can do. Check the iSeries Access site at www.iseries.ibm.com/access, take the Library link on the left, and look for _Client Access for Windows 95/NT ODBC User Guide_, which has excellent performance information. HTH Vern At 03:19 PM 10/21/2003 +0530, you wrote: >Hello all, >I am facing small problem. In my project. Please help me .. >I have application developed using VARPG The application server is in USA. >and my indian customer & USA customers are operating this application. >When US people are using this application while loading data in subfile >there is no problem. but when Indian users are accessing same application >via internet to load 550 records in a subfile from the database file it >takes around 15 minutes. Can anybody suggest me the better way / solution >for this problem. >(Note : The subfile is loaded record by record without using embedded sql.) > >Thanks in advance. > >Thanks & Regards >Mahesh Pawar >Project Manager
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.