RE: Performance increase with PC upgrade -- CODE400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Performance increase with PC upgrade
From: "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:30:53 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l>
List-help: <mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: CODE/400 Discussion & Support <code400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:code400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/code400-l>,<mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/code400-l>,<mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

>I only have 256 MB of Ram. When I run WDS it uses 500 MB of Ram. I think
>you are right about the XP thing. I'm trying to build a case to my
>superior to get me a new PC.

If you can't get a better PC I would just use CODE instead of trying to use
jLPEX with only 256MB of RAM.  CODE is _really_ fast compared to jLPEX.

Aaron Bartell

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.