RE: Verifying SQLRPGLE -- CODE400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Verifying SQLRPGLE
From: Buck Calabro <Buck.Calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 12:08:29 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l>
List-help: <mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: CODE/400 Discussion & Support <code400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:code400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/code400-l>,<mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/code400-l>,<mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

So.  In order for WDSc to properly verify SQLRPGLE, we need an optional
include for the SQLCA.  Is this limitation part of the multitude of other
SQL pre-processor limitations (which are being worked on, I know) or is this
something that the WDSc team can address?

I'm not keen on the idea that I need to modify my source code so that it
will verify properly in one particular development tool.
  --buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.