|
I've been taking a look at why the verifier performs so poorly when not using a cache, and I've found that it uses the remote command server (QZRCSRVS) jobs extensively. These jobs run in QUSRWRK, and are set to end after a single use, which leads to dozens of jobs being started and ended with each run of the verifier. I'm tempted to increase the number of uses allowed for each QZRCSRVS job, but am afraid of bad things happening if I do. Has anyone tried this? I know some will be tempted to tell me to just use the cache, but please save the keystrokes. I find the cache to be of almost no use to me, since my source members make extensive use of /copy members, which results in a frequent need to refresh the cache. And refreshing the cache takes longer than a verify done without it, so it's still quicker for me (overall) not to use it. I'm also hoping that the IBM team will chime in and and tell me that they've improved the verifier in the upcoming release so that it makes more intelligent use of the server resources. Please..please tell me it's so. John Taylor
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.