RE: Code/400 communications quality (was Terminal Server (citrixandcode400)

["Booth Martin" <Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Larry, I am with you on this.  My experiences of failures have been slight
and I've been using it far longer than a year.
 
What problems I have had seemed to be related to memory leaks from other
programs causing troubles.  
 
Reeve, I'd add in this question:  How much RAM have you in your machine? 
Under 256?  If so, buy a stick of 512 for $30 and see if that resolves your
problems.
 
 
 
---------------------------------------------------------
Booth Martin   http://www.MartinVT.com
Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: CODE/400 Discussion & Support
Date: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 14:04:27
To: CODE/400 Discussion & Support
Subject: RE: Code/400 communications quality (was Terminal Server (citrixand
code400)
 
Just so folks don't think that Reeve's experience is completely universal, I
would like to throw my $.02 in about using Code/400 remotely.
 
I have been working daily from WI over a cable Internet-VPN connection to my
office in CA for over a year. When I have had a failure, the underlying
cause has been the network or firewall, not the communications daemon.
Since fixing those underlying problems, the communication failures are
almost non-existant. This has been true for both 5.1 and 4.0.
 
Absolutely I wish Code400 handled the failures better when they occur, but I
see that as a separate issue.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: code400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:code400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Reeve Fritchman
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:23 AM
To: CODE/400 Discussion & Support
Subject: RE: Terminal Server (Citrix) and Code/400
 
 
I've been told the communications daemon (EVFCTCPD.EXE: despised throughout
the universe and the worst piece of comm software I've been force to use in
29 year of midrange experience; my comm-related failure rate over an
Internet WAN is 11.7%: 119 failures in 1,017 attempts) "will be replaced" by
the RSE communications manager...and I remember being unhappy about the
schedule date.
 
We'll see if it appears in WDSC V5, but I don't think it will; I suspect
OS/400 changes may be necessary to manage comm failures. I'm betting OS/400
V5R3 (which would be WDSC V6??? My hair hurts trying to track these
versions) is the best we can hope for. But I have no inside information, so
the best you can do is download source through the LPEX editor, edit using
CODE, and upload through the LPEX editor. Verify, one of the sweetest
features of CODE, probably won't work.
 
IBM's trying to do a lot with WDSC, and if they're like most other
businesses they're under-staffed. They have the CODE crowd to appease while
jumping onto the Eclipse bandwagon; I'd guess most users are LAN, not WAN,
and the communications daemon seems to work for in the LAN world.
 
-reeve