Re: Another Code Oddity -- CODE400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Another Code Oddity
From: "John Taylor" <jtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:54:05 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: CODE/400 Discussion & Support <code400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:code400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l>,<mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l>,<mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Mark,

> The number of these 'bugs' goes up in orders of magnitude in Designer.

Agreed. The only thing I use Designer for is reports, because it's less
painful than RLU. But I still find myself firing up SDA for screens. I
prefer Designer over SDA, but it's just not stable enough yet. Way too many
bugs.


Regards,

John Taylor

Follow-Ups:

RE: Another Code Oddity , Phil

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.