|
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Craig, You realize that you can use the verifier even now just by setting Code's library list yourself, don't you? That's what I always did at my previous employer where we had both. Having it automatically set the library list would be great, though. Dave Shaw Rauch Industries, Inc. Gastonia, NC -----Original Message----- From: craigs@dekko.com [mailto:craigs@dekko.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:25 PM To: code400-l@midrange.com Subject: Get Program Verifier into TurnOver I would really like to use the Program Verifier (Actions -> Verify program) but I can't because I am editing source in CODE/400 from TurnOver change management. I have wanted this functionality for many months but I don't think the SoftLanding's TurnOver people understand what the advantages of Program Verify are. I keep looking for this but nothing comes up. I sent a request to SoftLanding to have Verify capabilities in CODE/400 from TurnOver and they rejected it and said to use the *NOGEN on the compile to accomplish the same thing. Wrong. I probably should have marketed it better and mentioned the advantages of Verify but I didn't think I needed to. Some of this was probably my fault. When editing source from TurnOver, the TurnOver menu with options of "Compile -> Prompt" and "Compile -> No prompt" pop up. I have used this happily for most of my programming for a long time because it uses the library list set up by TurnOver. Why can't there be a TurnOver verify option like the compile? Is there anyone using CODE/400 and TurnOver that would like the Program Verify option? Can there be a solution (or a workaround) and can IBM work with SoftLanding again to get this resolved like they did with the compile? Stay tuned. I doubt SoftLanding would listen to just my concern but if everyone who wants this capability speaks out, maybe it could become a reality. I would think if IBM wants to market the Verify function, they would want to have it work with the TurnOver library list and would get on SoftLanding's case. I would be interested to know what IBM thinks of this functionality and other future change management software integrations. NOTE: I, in no way, wish to belittle IBM or SoftLanding in any way. I have been impressed with the high level of customer support and the speed at which my problems were resolved from IBM and SoftLanding. My opinion of advantages of using the Program Verify option (which I cannot use from TurnOver): I heard a long time ago that the main benefit of using the Program Verifier lies in the cache option. It appears that the two advantages of using the cache is that it really speeds up the verifier and you can verify disconnected from the AS/400. I was able to verifying a program that took 18 seconds uncached in 1 second cached. Keep in mind that the first time doing the cache on a verify still takes the normal verify or compile time but after that, you are really flying. I would really like to hear anyone's input on this subject and anything you might know about the future of TurnOver with CODE/400. Thanks, Craig Strong
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.