|
Thank you, Mike, for your quick response to my problems. The new .dll you sent me tested out great. I don't see any problems except for my previous items #2 and #3 that deal with saving cursor positions on DDS prompts. I am on Windows NT 4.0 but I have also seen items #2 and #3 happen on another person's Windows 2000 PC as well. I was pressing F4 when editing DDS source from the editor or the source edit tab in the Designer, not in the GUI. The only environment issues we have run into in the past with CODE/400 have been our Trend OfficeScan virus software causing help to take a long time. Telling our virus software to skip the help folders fixed the slow help. I don't know if our virus software could cause the cursor position save problems or not. I am not sure what other information you would need. I can't think of any special macros or editor settings that might deal with saving cursor positions in DDS prompts. Thanks, Craig Strong *** Mike Hockings wrote: Hi Craig, I've put some answers in your note below: Mike Mike Hockings, P.Eng. WebSphere Development Tools for AS/400 - CODE/Designer & WebFacing ! IBM Canada Ltd. Laboratory hockings@ca.ibm.com Please respond to code400-l@midrange.com Sent by: code400-l-admin@midrange.com To: code400-l@midrange.com cc: Subject: DDS prompting problem requests I have seen some annoying DDS prompting problems that I would please like to have reviewed and rated. I can still get the right data in the prompt, it is just that these problems make it more difficult. Thank you, Mike Hockings, for fixing the problem with new lines not having a DDS record type associated with them. It makes my DDS editing much easier. The problems appear in both the Editor and the source edit option of the Designer. I'm on SP4. The following are problem requests for prompting all DDS members (F4): 1. I think the ruler at the bottom of the prompt window should be slid left 9 spaces so it lines up with the input line. I think this ruler is kind of useless if it is not lined up with the actual line. Please slide this prompt ruler left 9 spaces. You are right, I have no idea why this should have happend as (well as far as I know) this code has not been changed. Internal defect #40761 has been opened to correct this. 2. When placing the cursor in any of the prompt fields and cancelling the prompt, the cursor positions are saved and I think this is a problem. Hitting F4 again on the same line or after the cursor is taken off the line and back, causes tabbing to stop at the saved cursor positions. If you prompt a different line, the cursor positions are reset. I would like to see the cursor appear at the beginning of the prompt fields, not where I last had my cursor. The following is a problem only in DDS members with indicators (DSPF, PRTF, ...?): 3. This problem is that in prompting DDS members on the indicators, the cursor position is saved permanently for that member until exiting editing or entering an indicator in that position. When you tab on a prompt, the cursor stops at the last cursor position saved. Please don't save these positions permanently. I'm not sure about 2. and 3. Designer doesn't do anything to save cursor positions and I can't seem to make it happen for me. (maybe I just need brain-dead instructions :-) My suspicion is that it is due to some editor setting or macro that you have on your system. Now for a question. 4. Since there appears to not be any way to add comments in columns 81-102 of DDS by either typing or prompting, why is this shown in the ruler of the edit window? I would think you would not want to add comments to the prompt ruler line either since you can't enter them anyway. It can confuse people. If there is some DDS member that would use comments there, the edit window ruler line should probably still have the comments and also be added to the prompt ruler line. Whether or not you can type beyond column 81 is dependent upon the record width of your srcpf that you are editing. Currently the rulers are "fixed" in that the same ruler is shown regardless of the width of the source file being edited. This, as you are finding out, could be misleading. I will see if it is easy to shorten the ruler to the lrecl of the current file (if shorter than the ruler). Internal defect 40762 has been opened for this problem. I do use the Designer most of the time, but there are times when I want to edit the DDS source. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Craig Strong _______________________________________________ This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) digest list To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.