|
When the compile is done the host will execute a "calls back" to the client. There are two possible reasons we can think of that might be causing this problem. 1. One of the firewalls (either the RT314 or the one between the cable modem and the 820) is not allowing the call back to pass through. So you can check which port the "call back" is using and make sure that the firewall allows the connection. You can probably get the port information from your firewall tools. 2. The host code is not getting the correct address to do the call back (and in fact is trying to connect to a different client.) If you go to a DOS window and run ipconfig then you will see all network addresses that the Windows machine is using. If there are multiple addresses listed then the first one must be the address that should be passed to the server for the "call back". On Windows 2000, I think that you can go to the Network Connections->Advance Settings to move your workstation address up and down. You might want to check if the feed back works by STRCODE and then on another OS400 session try the command: CALL QCODE/EVFCFDBK PARM( '37' 'Y' 'OS400' '<LOCAL> CODEEDIT "<OS400>lib/file(member)"' ). Change QCODE to QDEVTOOLS if you are on V5R1 OS/400. Hak Lui AS/400 AD, IBM Canada Ltd. e-mail: haklui@ca.ibm.com "Reeve Fritchman" <reeve@ltl400.com>@midrange.com on 11/21/2001 03:06:47 PM Please respond to code400-l@midrange.com Sent by: code400-l-admin@midrange.com To: "CODE400-L@midrange. com" <CODE400-L@midrange.com> cc: Subject: Network connection-restatement (sorry)-server can't find client I'm having trouble getting a CODE/400 server connection when working through my network connection. I can't get the error list back when I submit a compile; everything else (LPEX, Verify, GUI prompting, etc.) works fine. I know I could Verify first, but basing on caching performance, it's faster to compile. I have two systems connected to a Netgear RT314 Gateway Router (no ROTFLYAO, please) and then into a cable modem up to the 820 via a firewall. The RT314 provides NAT and some firewall protection. The IP address seen by the RT314 is not fixed (today it's 65.34.yada.yada); within the LAN, the RT314 is 192.168.0.1 and the other systems are ".2" and ".3". When I use a dial-up connection (without the RT314), everything works fine (because CODE/400 knows my IP address). I think this shows the server end is not causing the problem. I assume the RT314 is the issue. The iBox is giving me EVF4000, "A remote host refused an attempted connect operation." (3425). I'd be grateful for any help... Thanks, Reeve _______________________________________________ This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) mailing list To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.