RE: CPO work properly on Win2K? -- CODE400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: CPO work properly on Win2K?
From: "Phil" <sublime78ska@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 12:07:07 -0400
Importance: Normal
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: CODE/400 Discussion & Support <code400-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:code400-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l>,<mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l>,<mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Bob,

>  Just
> want you to
> have faith that it really does work.
>

In spite of it's quirks it's far better than SEU.  And with so many new
users (since it's free now) and IBM's desire to get rid of SEU I'm
anticipating a lot of improvements.

Phil


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.