× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 29-Nov-2013 08:06 -0800, Tom Hightower wrote:
<<SNIP>>
The date field in record number 4294967295 is: 2013-05-20

The error message:

Rewritten partially in symptom kwd form: msgCPF5035 rc17

Presumably that error was followed by a CPF5029 with all of the same information for its replacement variables?

17 -- The format of the data in a date, time, or timestamp field
is not valid.
<<SNIP>>

The numeric value 4294967295 is 2**32-1 which is larger than the largest possible Relative Record Number (RRN); i.e. the internal representation of a special value [intended to be] represented by the value -1, is instead presented as that large 4-billion-plus number. The claim of what data is in the diagnosed row number, is obviously flawed; i.e. no such row number is possible.

I do not recall what the value -1 implies. The value for Record Number of 0 implies that the operation was an insert [put] into the file.

If you create new files, copy the data to the new files, and then run the program against the new version of those files with the copied data, does the problem persist?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.