× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. COBOL400-L
  3. November 2009

Re: DFTACTGRP(*YES) vs ACTGRP(*Caller)

Yes - it is. In fact I never bother with multi-module programs - just single module programs and service programs. The performance of a program to program call these days is so fast that a bound call within the PGM object is rarely worth the effort.


Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



On 2-Nov-09, at 4:01 PM, Jeff Buening wrote:

Jon,
<"We are just going to start with one ILE program and one object and
<then advance from there."
<This is a really really bad idea and you could be in for a world of
<hurt.

Jon,
When I said one ILE program and one object I meant using CRTBNDCBL
and CRTBNDCL not just changing one program to ILE and all the rest stay
OPM, I should of clarified that. I meant we are not planning at the
beginning to use multiple modules in an object. I was thinking that was
okay.
<huge snip>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.