But it would not change defaults for the other programmers the OP is looking
for.

The problem is that I want to use ILE COBOL with WDSC but others still use
PDM and OPM, so what to make sure they get the correct default if they
compile.



On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes - but I hate changing system defaults. It always strikes me as
being in the category of "accident waiting to happen".

And by changing the default in WDSC/RDi it would be specified to the
compile.


Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



On 23-Oct-09, at 4:33 PM, MichaelQuigley@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Jon/Jeff,

Wouldn't changing the default on CRTBNDCBL do this for him? Unless
the
parameter is specified in WDSC/RDi, wouldn't it honor the command
default?

Michael
The Way International

cobol400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 10/23/2009 01:00:08 PM:

----- Message from Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Thu, 22
Oct 2009 15:45:49 -0400 -----

To:

COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 <cobol400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject:

Re: [COBOL400-L] ILE COBOL setting ACTGRP(name-group)

You should be able to set it in your compile options in WDSC Jeff and
it should remember. Worst case scenario design your own compile
command.


Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.