Jon Paris wrote:
On 12-Mar-09, at 4:00 PM, Chris Chambers wrote:
I would always call a CL program from within the COBOL.
QCMDEXC is just so ugly
And CL is therefore by definition "pretty"? You are jesting surely.
No, but then compiled CL has the CL compiler to help with a number
of things. Granted, for trivial stuff like individual overrides, a
compiled module is more than what's needed. But I see too many
instances of multiple commands being constructed in strings and then
passed on to be 'interpreted' by QCMDEXC/QCAPCMD, plus the
supporting code to retrieve inner messages, plus excess code to
handle quoted values... etc.
A compiled CL module makes a lot of those things so much nicer. It
also allows some modularity, as well as providing an object that can
be tested independently.
This comment is more about _overuse_ of QCMDEXC/QCAPCMD than
appropriate use. Setting an override seems appropriate use.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.