× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Ok, I meant AREA not ONLY!

-----Original Message-----
From: Weatherly, Howard (Contractor) (DLIS)
[mailto:Howard.Weatherly@dlis.dla.mil]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 10:44 AM
To: 'cobol400-l@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: R: COBOL WRITE after OPEN EXTEND results in
CLEAR-AFTER-WRITE


This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Folks,

COBOL has not changed this in 30 years, the only time the actual write
buffer is preserved after a write is when the record is also defined as
SAME-RECORD-ONLY or the WRITE statement fails. The only way to preserve the
contents if you have crafted a program that requires it is to work in
working-storage and do a WRITE FD-01-Record from WS-01-Record.

Having said that it is possible that the buffer may be usable after the
write i.e. preserved, but there are no guarantees on that.

-----Original Message-----
From: geir.kildal@entragroup.com [mailto:geir.kildal@entragroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 10:04 AM
To: cobol400-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: R: COBOL WRITE after OPEN EXTEND results in
CLEAR-AFTER-WRITE


This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Dennis.

I have looked up this in an old COBOL/400 reference(from the age of
Sauron), SC09-1240-00 page 196 - WRITE:  "After successful execution of
the WRITE or REWRITE statement, the current record may no longer be
available in  record-name, but is still available in identifier(WS-REC, my
comment)"


Mvh.

Geir


_______________________________________________
This is the COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 (COBOL400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: COBOL400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cobol400-l
or email: COBOL400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cobol400-l.
_______________________________________________
This is the COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 (COBOL400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: COBOL400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cobol400-l
or email: COBOL400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cobol400-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.