|
From: Jay Sulzmann <jsulzmann@HBS-INC.COM> > I'm not sure I agree. The word that scares me most is "always", as in > "always bad programming.". true, "always" is always scary, but take it as a shorthand for "almost all the time, unless you have a compelling reason not to - like management decree or such" > We have a lot of files that include *ISO date, > time, and timestamp items. I don't know what I'd do without the PROCESS > option DATETIME. If you have no choice, the choice is easy. But this does not invalidate the general principle that what you can express directly in the program source is preferable to a compiler option.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.