|
on the compiler generation options *UNREF is the default. *NOUNREF is what you are looking for. The UNREF default says remove unreferenced variables from the symbol table. =========================================================== R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr. -- IBM Certified Specialist - AS/400 Administrator -- IBM Certified Specialist - RPG IV Developer "America is the land that fought for freedom and then began passing laws to get rid of it." - Alfred E. Neuman -----Original Message----- From: Jim Essinger <esinger@fmtc.com> To: COBOL400-L@midrange.com <COBOL400-L@midrange.com> Date: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:41 AM Subject: Re: Debugging COBOL ILE - a BUG? >Geir, > >This has always troubled me. It has been that way in ILE COBOL as long as >I can remember. If you don't access the variable in the program, you don't >get to see it in the debug. I believe it has something to do with the >optimization that the ILE compiler does at compilation time. It is VERY >annoying at times, but I have not found away around it, other than to name >the field in an operation in a part of code that will not be >executed. MOVE Y to Y seems to work, does not destroy the contents, and >makes it available to debug. I only use this during debugging, and then >remove it from production code. > >Jim Essinger >Senior Programmer/Analyst >Student Loan Fund of Idaho >208-452-4058 >esinger@fmtc.com > > >At 02:18 PM 7/30/2001 +0200, you wrote: > >>Hello. >> >>Does anyone know why a WORKING-STORAGE element definition on lowest level, >>is not available in the 'EVAL' command in the debugger, UNLESS IT IS >>REFFERED TO WITHIN PROCEDURE DIVISION? >> >>An example from real life: >> >>WORKING STORAGE SECTION. >>01 WS-FIELDS. >> 05 X PIC 9. >> 05 Y PIC 9. >> >>PROCEDURE DIVISION. >>MAIN SECTION. >>A-000. >> move 1 to X (note that Y is not reffered to) >>... >>debugging: EVAL X gives result = 1 (OK) >> EVAL Y gives error message 'Identifier does not >> exist' >> >>In my example, the 'Y' got its value in return from a called procedure, >>but was not available in the debugger neither before nor after tha call! >> >> >> >>Mvh. >> >>Geir > >+--- >| This is the COBOL/400 Mailing List! >| To submit a new message, send your mail to COBOL400-L@midrange.com. >| To subscribe to this list send email to COBOL400-L-SUB@midrange.com. >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to COBOL400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. >| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com >+---END > +--- | This is the COBOL/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to COBOL400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to COBOL400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to COBOL400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---END
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.