Re: ILE - module overwiew - more detailed question

["Leif Svalgaard" <leif@xxxxxxxx>]

now I see it. If the program are missing you'll have to rely on other means.

How do you even know if a program is missing if you don't have a list somewhere?

Some source code or change management tools seem in order.

The bare minimum is a CL-program that you used to bind the program.

You don't do this "by hand" do you?

 

----- Original Message -----

From: geir.kildal@entragroup.com

To: COBOL400-L@midrange.com

Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 8:24 AM

Subject: ILE - module overwiew - more detailed question

Hello.

I want to be more exact in my question:  If I, in ILE-environment , for some reason, want to recreate some programs(the programs can be missing, but the source library containing the module-sources is available f. ex.), can I then find somewhere which modules the programs originally contained?  Or do I have to keep track of that with 'feather and ink' on my desk.


Mvh.

Geir

geir.kildal@entragroup.com Sent by: owner-cobol400-l@midrange.com 26.07.01 10:10 Please respond to COBOL400-L

To:        COBOL400-L@midrange.com         cc:                 Subject:        ILE - module overwiew?

Hello.

I'm still working my way into ILE:   In the OPM-world, all nessecary kode for a program is kept in the source member(except copys), and compiling the source gives you a runnable program.  The program overwiew is kept in the source files.

In the ILE-world, a program can be put together from several modules(each module has its own sourcecode).  Then I come to my question:  What is the best way of keeping track of which modules goes into which programs?  This can  obviously be a big problem unless it is kept in some code somewhere(CL-pgms keeping the info???)

What is common practice/wise to do?  


Mvh.

Geir Kildal