× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: CALL PROCEDURE RETURNING with different return fields
  • From: "Simon Coulter" <shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 May 01 13:57:35 +1000

M
Hello Leif,

You wote:
>===>apart from why the compiler does it stuff, how is
>the callee to know that you are calling it with a longer
>or shorter return value?

Because it doesn't care.  RETURNing a value from a procedure is like a MOVE 
operation.  The compiler takes care of the differences and it stops with the 
shortest field.  The callee simply returns as much data as it has and the 
receiving variable only gets as much as it has room for.  This allows the 
callee 
to make guesses based on the size of the input values.  Assuming the programmer 
making the call understands that on this call 10 bytes will be returned and on 
the next call 100 bytes will be returned then everything is fine.

What irritates me is that the COBOL compiler will allow the calls to have 
different return sizes -- just not in the same module.  That is obviously an 
artifical constraint imposed by the compiler writers trying to be too clever by 
half.

I guess I want to know if other COBOL programers find this behaviour weird too. 
 
In which case I might open a PMR.

Regards,
Simon Coulter.

«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»
«» FlyByNight Software         AS/400 Technical Specialists       «»
«» Eclipse the competition - run your business on an IBM AS/400.  «»
«»                                                                «»
«» Phone: +61 3 9419 0175   Mobile: +61 0411 091 400        /"\   «»
«» Fax:   +61 3 9419 0175   mailto: shc@flybynight.com.au   \ /   «»
«»                                                           X    «»
«»               ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail  / \   «»
«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»
+---
| This is the COBOL/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to COBOL400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to COBOL400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to COBOL400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---END


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.