× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Questions on CONVERT-DATE-TIME and ADD-DURATION
  • From: "Peter Lunde" <telsci@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:35:01 -0500

The IBM manual says that FUNCTION CONVERT-DATE-TIME argument-2 "specifies
the category of the return variable".
So much for IBM manuals.
Thanks to Finucci Domenico for informing us that argument-2 specifies the
category of argument-1!

You could save a few move commands by judicial use of a 05 level as follows,
but it does not make the program any faster or clearer.
0013.00        01  W-SYSTEM-DATE.
0014.00            05  W-SYSTEM-TIME-NUMERIC    PIC 9(14)V9(2).
0016.00        01  W-DATE-1                     PIC
9999/99/99/99,99,99.999999.
0017.00        01  W-SYSTEM-TIME                FORMAT TIME.
0018.00        PROCEDURE DIVISION.
0019.00        MAIN-PROGRAM SECTION.
0020.00        000-MAIN-PROGRAM.
0021.00            MOVE FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE TO W-SYSTEM-DATE.
0022.00            DISPLAY W-SYSTEM-TIME-NUMERIC.
0023.00            MOVE W-SYSTEM-TIME-NUMERIC TO W-DATE-1.
0024.00            MOVE "-"                   TO W-DATE-1(5:1)
0025.00            MOVE "-"                   TO W-DATE-1(8:1)
0026.00            MOVE "-"                   TO W-DATE-1(11:1)
0027.00            MOVE "."                   TO W-DATE-1(14:1)
0028.00            MOVE "."                   TO W-DATE-1(17:1)
0029.00            MOVE FUNCTION CONVERT-DATE-TIME(W-DATE-1 TIMESTAMP)
0030.00              TO W-SYSTEM-TIME.
No wonder people are migrating away from COBOL is it takes 7 statements to
put the current date into a timestamp format.
Yes, I know you can INSPECT W-DATE-1 REPLACING "/" WITH "-".
and INSPECT W-DATE-1 RELACING "," WITH "."., but that's slower and still
leaves 4 statements.
Hey IBM!  How about "MOVE FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE(TIMESTAMP) TO W-DATE-1."?
I know, I know.  Use an API.  But why do I have to retrieve the system
status just to get the current date in a timestamp format?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Finucci Domenico" <finucci@Fiditalia.it>
To: <COBOL400-L@midrange.com>
Cc: "'Robert E. Burger'" <rburger@home.net>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 3:30 AM
Subject: R: Questions on CONVERT-DATE-TIME and ADD-DURATION


> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Robert E. Burger [mailto:rburger@home.net]
> Inviato: domenica 27 febbraio 2000 08.20
> A: cobol400-L@midrange.com
> Oggetto: Questions on CONVERT-DATE-TIME and ADD-DURATION
>
> Answer :
> Try to edit the program this way:
>
> WORKING
> 01 w-SYSTEM-DATE           pic x(21).
> (**) 01 w-date-1                             pic x(26).
> 01 w-SYSTEM-TIME           FORMAT TIME.
>
>
> (**) You know that the format for a timestamp item must be:
> "YYYY-MM-DD-hh.mm.ss.nnnnnn"  where nnn is 1000th sec,
>            26 byte total.
>
>
> PROCEDURE
>  move w-system-date(1:4)  to w-date-1(1:4)
>  move "-"                                  to w-date-1(5:1)
>  move w-system-date(5:2)  to w-date-1(6:2)
>  move "-"                                  to w-date-1(8:1)
>  move w-system-date(7:2)  to w-date-1(9:2)
>  move "-"                                  to w-date-1(11:1)
>  move w-system-date(9:2)  to w-date-1(12:2)
>  move "."                                  to w-date-1(14:1)
>  move w-system-date(11:2) to w-date-1(15:2)
>  move "."                                   to w-date-1(17:1)
>  move w-system-date(13:2) to w-date-1(18:2)
>  move "."                                    to w-date-1(20:1)
>  move "000000"                       to w-date-1(21:6)
>  display "w-date-1 " w-date-1
>  MOVE FUNCTION CONVERT-DATE-TIME (w-date-1  TIMESTAMP)
>       TO w-SYSTEM-TIME.
>
> Let me know if this works on yr. AS/400 too.
> Regards.
> D. Finucci
> Fiditalia SPA, Milano
>
>
>
> +---
> | This is the COBOL/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to COBOL400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to COBOL400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
COBOL400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---END
>
>

+---
| This is the COBOL/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to COBOL400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to COBOL400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to COBOL400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---END



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.