|
Welcome to all the new members of the list. I have a question for all. How did you come to use COBOL on the AS/400? In my case, we were developing a new application on a new System/38 and got to chose the language. Out of 70 programmers, I was the only one with RPG, and it was not on the IBM midrange. We asked around, and "everyone" said that RPG was the "native" language, ran faster, was better supported. Being the doubter I am, we ran tests, comparing COBOL to RPG. To our surprise, COBOL executed just as quickly as RPG on the whole. Each language had an area where it was faster, but overall, they were very similar in speed. We then got some mainframe COBOL user's involved. After a little introduction to the System/38, and the way I/O was handled, they took to it like a duck in water. We decided to go with COBOL. As development progressed, we were always pushing the envelope. IBM would have a new feature, we would probably use it. We ended up finding a few bugs, but IBM was always quick to correct them. In fact, we often got to deal directly with members of the COBOL development team. (This was in the mid 80's). That's my story, what's yours? Bob +--- | This is the COBOL/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to COBOL400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to COBOL400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to COBOL400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---END
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.