Zvi
I have always steered away from the QXX API's as they are very slow, I think
I read in the manual somewhere about the reasons for the slowness but cannot
remember. I did use them very extensively for managing a repeating process
to track data elements and it was very slow and high in CPU  in comparison
to the alternative which uses USRSPC and pointers to track data. The sample
I submitted was used to track journal receiver delete requirements for a
single customer, our product had work if the DA was not there hence the use
of the API (PLUS.. The QXX API's only work with character data, so I would
have to convert a character string to a number every time it was read.).
I should really set up a test and do a retrieval in a loop and look at the
CPU cycles etc for each method, one day.. I just don't use data areas much
anymore as other options are far better and much more flexible. 
Chris..
-----Original Message-----
From: C400-L [mailto:c400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Zvi Kave
Sent: March 11, 2015 3:57 AM
To: c400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [C400-L] Check existence of data area in ILE C
   Hi Chris,
   I shall try it later because I need a quick solution.
   In the meantime I need only to replace  _CTLA_HANDLE with
   _CTLA_HANDLE_NO_MSG
   in the exception handler.
   Do I save CPU in your solution or it is the same, but without exception
   handler ?
   Thanks,
   Zvi
   On 10/03/2015 20:10, [1]chrish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
 Here is a quick sample for a data area which is a decimal data area (cannot
be retrieved using the QXX API's)
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <qusec.h>
 #include <decimal.h>
 #include <qwcrdtaa.h>
 typedef _Packed struct DA_content_x {
                        Qwc_Rdtaa_Data_Returned_t hdr;
                        char data[10];
                        } DA_content_t;
 int main(int argc, char **argv) {
 int rcvr_count = 0;
 DA_content_t Dta_Content;                   /* data area content */
 decimal(5,0) *d_ptr;
 char DA_Name[20] = "NBROFRCV  CHLIB     ";  /* Name */
 Qus_EC_t Error_Code = {0};                  /* error code struct */
 Error_Code.Bytes_Provided = sizeof(Error_Code);
 QWCRDTAA(&Dta_Content,
          sizeof(Dta_Content),
          DA_Name,
          1,
          5,
          &Error_Code);
 if(Error_Code.Bytes_Available > 0) {
    // do something about the error
    printf("Error received %.7s\n",Error_Code.Exception_Id);
    return -1;
    }
 printf("Available = %d\n",Dta_Content.hdr.Bytes_Available);
 printf("Returned = %d\n",Dta_Content.hdr.Bytes_Returned);
 printf("Type = %.10s\n",Dta_Content.hdr.Type_Value_Returned);
 printf("Length = %.10s\n",Dta_Content.hdr.Length_Value_Returned);
 printf("Decimal pos = %d\n",Dta_Content.hdr.Number_Decimal_Positions);
 d_ptr = (decimal(5,0)*)Dta_Content.data; printf("Content =
%D(5,0)\n",*d_ptr); return 1;  }
 It's simple and easy to understand and does not require you to build in
your  own error handler. Write it up as a generic handler for retrieving any
data  area content.
 Chris...
 -----Original Message-----
 From: C400-L [[2]mailto:c400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Zvi Kave
 Sent: March 10, 2015 12:04 PM
 To: [3]c400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: Re: [C400-L] Check existence of data area in ILE C
    Very nice.
    _CTLA_HANDLE_NO_MSG made the trick!!
    Many thanks,
    Zvi
    On 10/03/2015 17:36, CRPence wrote:
      On 10-Mar-2015 10:20 -0500, Zvi Kave wrote:
        Sorry. It is too much complicated for me.
        Waiting for simpler solution.
        Perhaps a change in the exception handler?:
         #pragma exception_handler(ERROR_OCCURED, ca, 0, _C2_MH_ESCAPE, \
                                     _CTLA_HANDLE, "MCH3401")
        Of course that would not resolve the issue of concurrency introduced
      by performing a separate /check for existence/ test prior to invoking
      the request to /Retrieve Data Area/ that itself performs the same
      existence check.  Nevertheless...
        I was unaware that the capability to suppress the messaging was
      exposed externally in any of the HLLs, but a quick search of the
      KnowledgeCenter revealed that there are both of the Exception Control
      Actions available to the C language, "_CTLA_IGNORE_NO_MSG" and
      "_CTLA_HANDLE_NO_MSG", which apparently provide the equivalent effect
of
      the message suppression:
 
[1][4]<
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_ibm_i_71/rzarf/prag_ex
cep
 tion_handler.htm%23prag_exception_handler>
      "...
      ctl_action
          Specifies an integer constant to indicate what action should take
      place for this exception handler. If handler is a function, the
default
      value is _CTLA_INVOKE. If handler is a label, the default value is
      _CTLA_HANDLE. This parameter is optional.
          The following are valid exception control actions that are defined
      in the <except.h> header file:
          #define name     Defined value and action
      ...
      _CTLA_HANDLE_NO_MSG     Defined to 3. The exception is handled but
      messages are not logged before calling the handler. The exception will
      no longer be active when the handler gets control. Exception messages
      are not logged. Msg_Ref_Key in the typedef _INTRPT_Hndlr_Parms_T is
set
      to zero. Exception processing ends when the exception handler returns.
      This is valid for functions and labels.
       ...
      _CTLA_IGNORE_NO_MSG     Defined to 132. The exception is handled and
      messages are not logged. Control is not passed to the handler function
      named on the directive and exception will no longer be active.
 Execution
      resumes at the instruction immediately following the instruction that
      caused the exception. This is valid for functions only.
       ..."
 References
    Visible links
    1.
 
[5]
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_ibm_i_71/rzarf/prag_except
ion
 _handler.htm%23prag_exception_handler
 --
 This is the Bare Metal Programming IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (C400-L)
mailing list To post a message email: [6]C400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
 visit: [7]
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l
 or email: [8]C400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx  Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at  [9]
http://archive.midrange.com/c400-l.
References
   Visible links
   1. mailto:chrish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   2. mailto:c400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   3. mailto:c400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   4.
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_ibm_i_71/rzarf/prag_exception
_handler.htm%23prag_exception_handler
   5.
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_ibm_i_71/rzarf/prag_exception
   6. mailto:C400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   7. 
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l
   8. mailto:C400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   9. 
http://archive.midrange.com/c400-l
--
This is the Bare Metal Programming IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (C400-L)
mailing list To post a message email: C400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: 
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l
or email: C400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/c400-l.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.