"Problem" is that this is not my source code and I am just trying to get
this compiled on IBM i. Of course I could use #pragma and of course I
could just use __inline.

My goal is not to have to change the source code.

But thanks for pointing out the possibility of using #pragma inline.

Regards

Mihael

-----Original Message-----
From: c400-l-bounces+mihael.schmidt=rossmann.de@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:c400-l-bounces+mihael.schmidt=rossmann.de@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Simon Coulter
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 12:41 PM
To: C programming iSeries / AS400
Subject: Re: [C400-L] problem with inline function


On 05/02/2010, at 9:08 PM, Schmidt, Mihael wrote:

Seems that the ILE C compiler does not bother with the missing
inline on
the prototype: no error or warning on compilation.

But I still have to use the "old" C89 style inline keyword "__inline"
instead of just "inline". Is there a compile option to use the newer
keyword definition "inline"?


I thought

#pragma inline ( function-name )

was the correct way to accomplish this.

Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists

http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------




This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].