Re: RE: Porting C Linux to ILE C: Performance problem -- C400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: [C400-L] RE: Porting C Linux to ILE C: Performance problem
From: "Keith Carpenter" <CarpCon@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:12:33 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/c400-l>
List-help: <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: C programming iSeries / AS400 <c400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:c400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l>, <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l>, <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

4gb is the limit for 16 byte pointers.
Larger allocations require 8 byte pointers and DTAMDL(*LLP64)

Apparently these 8 byte pointers should also perform better.
ILE concepts, Chapter 4.


> It sounds to me though, that the original poster really needs to look at
the
> teraspace compile options.  With it, you can allocate up to 4GB blocks (on
> V5R1).

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: RE: Porting C Linux to ILE C: Performance problem , Blair Wyman

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.